New Workplace Injury Reporting

Will New OSHA Guidelines Reduce Workplace Accidents?

Will New OSHA Guidelines Reduce Workplace Accidents?

January 1, 2017, won’t just ring in the New Year, it will also ring in the effective date of a host of new government regulations. Among them is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) new workplace injury reporting rule that has already met with opposition from business groups who question whether the new rule might actually derail programs designed to reduce workplace accidents. The government, on the other hand, claims that the new reporting rule will pressure employers to maintain safer workplaces and erase any fear of retaliation that the injured employee might face when reporting an injury.

Behavioral Economics

In announcing the new workplace injury reporting rule, dubbed “Improve Tracking Workplace Injuries and Illnesses,” OSHA cited concepts of human behavior and motivation: “Behavioral economics tells us that making injury information publicly available will ‘nudge’ employers to focus on safety. And, as we have seen in many examples, more attention to safety will save the lives and limbs of many workers, and will ultimately help the employer’s bottom line as well” (https://www.osha.gov/recordkeeping/finalrule/).

Electronic Reporting of Injuries

The new rule requires certain employers now to electronically submit injury and illness data that they are already required to record on their OSHA Injury and Illness forms. OSHA will analyze the data as part of its enforcement and compliance functions, and, much like other regulatory agencies, it will post some of the enforcement case data to its website. The amount of data required to be submitted will vary depending on the size of company and type of industry.

Two-Year Phase-In

Businesses with 250 or more employees in industries covered by the recordkeeping regulation must submit injury or illness information from their 2016 Form 300A by July 1, 2017. They will be required to submit information from their 2017 forms (300A, 300, and 301) by July 1, 2018. Beginning in 2019 and every year thereafter, the information must be submitted by March 2. Establishments with 20–249 employees in certain high-risk industries must submit information from their 2016 Form 300A by July 1, 2017, and their 2017 Form 300A by July 1, 2018. Beginning in 2019 and every year thereafter, the information must be submitted by March 2.

Anti-Retaliation Provision

The rule is also intended to protect workers from employer retaliation arising from the reporting of a workplace injury or illness. Until now, anti-retaliation protection for workers was implicit, but the new rule gives examples of what an employer can or cannot do as to company policies aimed at reducing workplace injuries. Essentially, employer procedures for reporting work-related injuries and illnesses must be reasonable and must not deter or discourage employees from reporting such injuries or illnesses. The anti-retaliation feature of the rule becomes effective December 1, 2016.

Industry Opposition

While regard for workplace safety is a concern of both employer and employee, on July 8, 2016, a group of trade associations and a workers’ compensation insurer filed a lawsuit against the anti-retaliation provision of the rule. Their objection was based on the preamble to the rule that cited post-accident drug testing as well as safety incentive programs as violations of the provision. The plaintiffs argued that post-accident drug testing as well as safety incentive programs that reward employees who maintain a safe workplace have been proven to reduce workplace injuries.

While a federal judge in Texas has ruled that no “irreparable harm” was foreseen by implementation of the provision, and he therefore denied the motion for injunctive relief, the case still awaits a full hearing on the merits of the complaint. In the meantime, the January 1, 2017, effective date remains.

After receiving his Juris Doctor degree from The John Marshall Law School in Chicago, Mr. Brochin served as an Administrative Law Judge with the Illinois Department of Labor for six years. Following that position, he was a solo practitioner in the fields of Real Estate Law and Commercial Contracts Transactions for twenty years. In 2003, he was recruited to head an outsource title research company in Israel, and since 2007, he has engaged in litigation support for several high profile cases. He has taught Business Law as a faculty member of the Jerusalem College of Technology, and for the past three years, he has authored a wide variety of legal White Papers and timely legal articles as a professional legal content writer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>