LEAVING LIBOR

Seeking a Benchmark that Can't Be Manipulated

Seeking a Benchmark that Can’t be Manipulated

In 1986, the British Bankers’ Association (BBA) created the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) in response to the need for a reliable, unified benchmark rate for calculating loans between British banks. It soon developed into one of the primary global interest rate benchmarks for debt instruments ranging from government bonds to home mortgages, credit cards, student loans and many others. Based on a basket of five currencies—the U.S. dollar, the Euro, the Pound Sterling, Swiss Franc and Japanese Yen—LIBOR was relied upon by U.S. financial institutions for rating trillions of dollars’ worth of debt. But a little more than two years after the catastrophic LIBOR rate-fixing scandal broke, U.S. regulators are poised to leave LIBOR in favor of an alternative benchmark. Figuring out how to set the interest rate for $160 trillion in U.S. financial products and debt is no simple task.

Continue reading

New EU Regs in Wake of “Panama Papers” Scandal

The Panama Papers scandal prompted changes to tax laws

The Panama Papers scandal prompted changes to tax laws

In the aftermath of the global tax evasion scandal known as the “Panama Papers,” the European Commission has proposed sweeping new changes to the reporting and disclosure requirements for corporations doing business throughout the twenty-eight European Union member countries. While the use of offshore entities is not illegal, utilizing them to breach tax laws is. The disclosures gleaned from the massive leak of confidential information from a leading Panamanian law firm revealed a scope—in dollar amounts and number of entities and world figures involved—which was previously unheard of. The resulting media clamor left the EU little choice but to come down hard and fast.

The Panamanian Epicenter

In early 2015, an anonymous whistleblower leaked over eleven million documents from a Panamanian law firm to a German newspaper, which then organized a team of four hundred investigative journalists to conduct in-depth research and document review. Fourteen months later, the investigative consortium exposed the use of 214,000 offshore companies set up in Panama, the British Virgin Islands, Hong Kong, and elsewhere by account holders and offshore operators, ranging from five heads of state to numerous high government officials and managers of multinational companies.

Continue reading